A taste:
Indeed if, as seems true, there was something deficient about pre–Vatican II theological training, even in Rome, the deficiency will not be made up by a return to an exclusivist Thomism, much less to the old Thomistic manuals. A return to Thomas read and studied in the original texts would doubtless help. But such a return would not have helped the young Kenny with his question. For the theologian who had a good answer, Duns Scotus, is barely studied, if studied at all. His very name raises hackles or eyebrows or both. The man is accused by some of causing the theological decline of the West. It is said that he precipitated the destruction of a magnificent and glorious edifice with his falsely subtle distinctions, his flattening metaphysics of univocity, his skeptical undermining of rational proofs for the faith, his tortuous Latin.
3 comments:
There's still hope for reconciliation:
https://columbustelegram.com/news/local/scotus-aquinas-grads-work-together-in-st-paul/article_b7d8dd66-c1fc-5e85-a434-86d5eaf19c37.html
Can't read it in Europe, alas.
Nor did your other link work either. But the download did. Good times.
Post a Comment