tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post5166237370279577727..comments2024-03-11T04:11:06.487-04:00Comments on The Smithy: Additio auctoris incertiLee Faberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-20531333580598976562008-06-29T23:35:00.000-04:002008-06-29T23:35:00.000-04:00Nescio quod dicis.Nescio quod dicis.Michael Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11191322302191384384noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-35102378723960424302008-06-29T21:28:00.000-04:002008-06-29T21:28:00.000-04:00no you don't-you don't have that much will powerno you don't-you don't have that much will powerLee Faberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-86771211007356097502008-06-29T17:29:00.000-04:002008-06-29T17:29:00.000-04:00Odio te, frater meus.Odio te, frater meus.Michael Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11191322302191384384noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-58305150652146833772008-06-28T13:17:00.000-04:002008-06-28T13:17:00.000-04:00only yourself, mon frereonly yourself, mon frereLee Faberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-45246805307018685742008-06-27T22:53:00.000-04:002008-06-27T22:53:00.000-04:00I neglected in a most unscholarly fashion to clari...I neglected in a most unscholarly fashion to clarify that this passage follows distinction 3 of <I>Book II</I> of the commentary. I'm so used to reading this <I>locus</I> in various authors by now that I forgot that others might need specification. <BR/><BR/>Not that anyone besides Faber is reading this anyway--who am I kidding?Michael Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11191322302191384384noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-51160773207734578132008-06-23T20:36:00.000-04:002008-06-23T20:36:00.000-04:00interesting. I like the bit about diversity in the...interesting. I like the bit about diversity in the roots results in lack of agreement in the branches. It does seem to be in the style of Bonaventure, at least in laying out the opinions of the magnorum, then opting for the least dangerous one.Lee Faberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.com