tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post4804377853653067812..comments2024-03-11T04:11:06.487-04:00Comments on The Smithy: Some Free ResearchLee Faberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-42122757616025936672007-11-12T14:20:00.000-05:002007-11-12T14:20:00.000-05:00I don't know if Richard would be referring directl...I don't know if Richard would be referring directly to Godfrey, whether or not the latter held the same opinion. Wouldn't he be a little too late for Richard?<BR/><BR/>A number of Franciscans talk about existence as a quasi-accident of the <I>essence</I>, though not of the composite. I think even Thomas talks like this sometimes. It wouldn't surprise me if Scotus does the same--I think he does, e.g. in the individuation questions.<BR/><BR/>Given that God wills and loves his own knowledge it would make some sense that he would love the objects of his knowledge, I think, though not in the same way that he would actual existents, just as I don't love Gandalf in the same way I love you.Michael Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11191322302191384384noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-3586118086918751062007-11-11T10:16:00.000-05:002007-11-11T10:16:00.000-05:00very learned. So, of the first three opinions, is ...very learned. So, of the first three opinions, is the first one Godfrey of Fontaine's?<BR/><BR/>And doesn't Scotus somewhere talk about existence as a quasi-accident? I wonder if he discusses Richard.<BR/><BR/>Oh yes. I was reading the other day in the ordinatio, and found Scotus to be making the odd point (at least to me; i've never heard anyone else say this) that God loves all the possible beings his intellect conceives.Lee Faberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-86702696333530794512007-11-11T10:06:00.000-05:002007-11-11T10:06:00.000-05:00Here's that reference I keep forgetting to send yo...Here's that reference I keep forgetting to send you:<BR/><BR/>H. Klug, “Die Lehre der Immaterialitat der Engel und Menschenseelen nach Duns Skotus,” Franz. Stud. (1916) ?-?Lee Faberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-33890010664570626542007-11-03T16:24:00.000-04:002007-11-03T16:24:00.000-04:00sweet. I'll try to read it carefully when I have s...sweet. I'll try to read it carefully when I have some time and come up with qq.Lee Faberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.com