tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post3956297777099682068..comments2024-03-11T04:11:06.487-04:00Comments on The Smithy: A New Argument for the Univocity of BeingLee Faberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-47214824491293071332018-09-17T08:13:35.053-04:002018-09-17T08:13:35.053-04:00Interestingly, this argument shows up in Thomas Wy...Interestingly, this argument shows up in Thomas Wylton's QQ super Ph. I q. 13, ed. Schmaus, which date to 1301-4. So much earlier than Peter Thomae. For Wylton, it is one of the principal arguments that he rejects: "Item ens est contrahibile".Lee Faberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.com