tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post3490446399332535211..comments2024-03-11T04:11:06.487-04:00Comments on The Smithy: Thomism After Vatican IILee Faberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-2874621192670918402013-07-16T10:59:20.526-04:002013-07-16T10:59:20.526-04:00I think Ott favors Thomism, but I've always th...I think Ott favors Thomism, but I've always thought he is trying to be fair and accurately present the other sides, sort of like a Copleston of the Manualists. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-65882473353724310032013-07-16T04:10:38.785-04:002013-07-16T04:10:38.785-04:00I feel like many of the Thomist renewals mostly co...I feel like many of the Thomist renewals mostly consist in an Aristotelian renewal. That is, what is being revived under the name of "Thomism" is just Aristotelian metaphysical distinctions, which pretty much any medieval can accept. At the very least this is the case among "analytic Thomists."<br /><br />I do hope all these renewals will eschew the false narratives of the past and will allow room for some pluralism, e.g. for Scotists.<br /><br />By the way, only somewhat related, do you feel that Ludwig Ott's book has a Thomistic bias?awatkins909https://www.blogger.com/profile/04272494240109130737noreply@blogger.com