tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post1440381572064710287..comments2024-03-11T04:11:06.487-04:00Comments on The Smithy: MacIntyre on ScotusLee Faberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-48791761721447082372012-06-09T09:32:57.434-04:002012-06-09T09:32:57.434-04:00Thanks for the clarification. I'll send a link...Thanks for the clarification. I'll send a link to this post to those who I think may be interested parties.Asello Guzmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02353868734730914072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-28063259307395126392012-06-07T15:10:30.985-04:002012-06-07T15:10:30.985-04:00The title's are there, I just translated them ...The title's are there, I just translated them into english rather than include the special formatting required for foreign language titles. There is no missing info. And I hardly find it useful to count how many times he mentions Boethius' name or Augustine's or whatever. He rarely cites them directly (when he does its on the order of 'Aquinas, quinque viae, ST Ia.' etc.) and obviously he is just building his discourse on the secondary sources. <br /><br />The point is against authoritarians like Mark Wauk who do not cite primary sources but rely solely on the authority of thomist authors like Macintyre. He claimed I wasn't dealing with his auctoritates, so here I deal with one of them, demonstrating that he is relying on outdated scholarship and does not bother to give any evidence for his interpretations of Scotus. I will look at those interpretations in a future post.<br /><br />If you're confused by 5/V...Lee Faberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-87702989009435086642012-06-07T13:09:22.980-04:002012-06-07T13:09:22.980-04:00I'm confused by the way you selected which not...I'm confused by the way you selected which notes to type out. You did not include French, German, or Latin titles -- what if those contain sufficient information to demonstrate what MacIntyre is trying to prove? Also, why not mention primary literature? It seems that you're stacking the deck against him. <br /><br />Do you use the same method with ch. V? or is it 5? This post could be useful if it were a bit clearer.Asello Guzmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02353868734730914072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-36170713324097144822012-06-06T14:33:16.711-04:002012-06-06T14:33:16.711-04:00That's hilarious.That's hilarious.Credo In Unum Deumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12853267753412902721noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-87081516004607596852012-06-06T14:11:32.437-04:002012-06-06T14:11:32.437-04:00Umberto Eco as an authority on Scotus? Really?Umberto Eco as an authority on Scotus? Really?Estasehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14218134057991196938noreply@blogger.com