tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post1221497329209165643..comments2024-03-11T04:11:06.487-04:00Comments on The Smithy: Kinds of Memory according to James of AesculoLee Faberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-45170530484035604232011-04-11T23:56:44.792-04:002011-04-11T23:56:44.792-04:00It's too bad the one section diverges so much....It's too bad the one section diverges so much. I have toyed with doing an edition of the ordinary questions (only four mss. so far) and the tabula one day. According to Dumont the Tabula varies a bit as well.Lee Faberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-77578598028469686692011-04-11T15:05:59.762-04:002011-04-11T15:05:59.762-04:00er.. that should be an ipsi potenti, of course. Th...er.. that should be an ipsi potenti, of course. There are probably other typos too. Good enough.Bubbanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-39101980028542648072011-04-11T15:01:29.571-04:002011-04-11T15:01:29.571-04:00Filling in some blanks from VL 1012.
n.b., there&#...Filling in some blanks from VL 1012.<br />n.b., there's considerable variation in the texts; where your ms has "intentionaliter", 1012 reads "memorialiter".<br /><br />The text I have for the "Secunda differentia" is considerably down the page and too different to consider collating.<br /><br />I'll leave to you the punctuation (or to just go back and see if what I've got corresponds to your MS).<br /><br />per quod obiectum tantum memorialiter et realiter est sufficienter presens in ratione obiecti ipsi potentie ut possit habere actum suum quidquid sid illud sive species sive habitus secundum diversas opinionens. Voco autem primum actum virtualem quando obiecto est presens virtualiter et realiter in memoria ipsi potentie per se ipsum sive per propriam virtutem* et non per aliud subiective existens in memoria et contra* sive sit presens ipsi potenti per realem ydemptitatem sicut anima est presens sibi ipsi secundum beatum Augustinum IX De Trinitate sive sit presens per quandam presentiam sive assistentiam realem...<br /><br />est perfectior quacumque perfectione vel presentia que habetur de illo obiecto...<br /><br /><br />CheersBubbanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-14716684693828983802011-04-06T22:34:41.888-04:002011-04-06T22:34:41.888-04:00The formatting on this post is a nightmare. For th...The formatting on this post is a nightmare. For the life of me, i can't get the paragraphs to line up without hmtl warning notes.Lee Faberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-66456165700424013172011-04-06T22:30:02.166-04:002011-04-06T22:30:02.166-04:00Ah, old friend James of Ascoli, I know him well. H...Ah, old friend James of Ascoli, I know him well. He's the authority for Gonsalvus Hispanus' authorship of the <i>Conclusiones metaphysicae</i>.Michael Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11191322302191384384noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-16092512242258684362010-07-09T15:47:40.079-04:002010-07-09T15:47:40.079-04:00Thanks for the tip bubba. it looks like just the Q...Thanks for the tip bubba. it looks like just the Quodlibet to me; there is sentence-commentary-like material, but it matches the stuff if krakow 732 that normally is attributed to Alnwick.Lee Faberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-61669113703024188382010-07-06T05:04:41.127-04:002010-07-06T05:04:41.127-04:00The rumor on the line is that Leipzig UB 609 has a...The rumor on the line is that Leipzig UB 609 has a Sentences commentary in addition to/instead of a Quodlibet. I wasn't able to check this myself.Bubbanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-14671986486140550322010-06-30T14:19:52.596-04:002010-06-30T14:19:52.596-04:00Nice. I wonder where they got the bit about the se...Nice. I wonder where they got the bit about the sentence-commentary...I've examined most of the literature on him and never heard of it, though he would of course had to have lectured at some point to be a master.Lee Faberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00476833516234522602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472139466585018053.post-84797117219668443542010-06-29T16:33:13.989-04:002010-06-29T16:33:13.989-04:00James does indeed receive an entry in the Cambridg...James does indeed receive an entry in the Cambridge History. In it's entirety:<br /><br />Vol.2, p. 898:<br />"James of Ascoli (Jacobus de Aesculo) <i>fl.</i> 1310s. Franciscan theologian and follower of Scotus. Master of theology at Paris by 1309; regent master in 1310-11. Active in inquisitions against Marguerite of Porete and Peter of John Olivi. Extant words include various quodlibetal and disputed questions (part. ed. Yokoyama 1967) and an incomplete <i>Sentences</i> commentary (unedited)."Erichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15177742566251873537noreply@blogger.com